COMPARISON OF MRA RENAL ANATOMIC IMAGE INFORMATION USING TIME OF FLIGHT AND PHASE CONTRAST METHODS AT RADIOLOGY INSTALLATION OF ARIFIN ACHMAD Hospital, RIAU PROVINCE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54973/miror.v2i2.250Abstract
Background: The hospital has standardized the selection of sequences used for MRA examination. In the Radiology Installation of Arifin Achmad Hospital, Riau Province, only one time of flight sequence was used from two non-contrast MRA sequences, namely time of flight and phase contrast. In this regard, there are two sequences of non-contrast MRA examination that need to be used in order to identify and produce a good image of the renal vessels.
Methods: This study is a quantitative study with an experimental approach that aims to determine differences in information on anatomical MRA Renal images using 2 non-contrast MRA methods, namely time of flight and phase contrast. This study applies the Lemeshaw formula with a 95% confidence level, using 10 Renal MRA patients and 3 radiology specialists as respondents for image assessment.
Results: The results showed that there was no difference between tof and pc sequences in the anatomy of the renal arteries and segmental arteries. However, there were significant differences shown in the anatomical assessments performed (interlobar arteries, arcate arteries, and interlobular arteries). Almost all indicators show a p-value of <0.050, with the 3d time of flight sequence showing superiority in all aspects assessed compared to the 3d phase contrast sequence.
Conclusion: There is a difference in anatomical image information on the Renal MRA using 3d time of flight sequences and 3d phase contrast. In the 3d time of flight sequence, it is able to produce arterial images well but lacks in displaying venous images. On the other hand, the 3d time of flight sequence is good at showing veins and lacking in arterial imaging.
Keywords: mra renal; time of flight; phase contrast
Downloads
References
Bakare, A. B et al. 2021. Quantifying Mitochondrial Dynamics in Patient Fibroblasts with Multiple Developmental Defects and Mitochondrial Disorders,” Int. jounal Mol. Sci.
Chapman B. E dan Parker, D. L. 2005. 3D multi-scale vessel enhancement filtering based on curvature measurements: application to time-of-flight MRA, Med. Image Anal., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 191–208.
Dale, B. M, Brown, M. A. dan Semelka, R. C. 2015. MRI Basic Principles and Applications, 5th ed. Wiley.
Departemen Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. 2013. Riset Kesehatan Dasar. Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kesehatan, Departemen Kesehatan Republik Indonesia.
Falah, A dan Harun, H. 2018. Hipertensi Renovaskular, J. Kesehat. Andalas
Glockner, J. F. et al., 2010. Non-contrast renal artery MRA using an inflow inversion recovery steady state free precession technique (inhance): Comparison with 3D contrast-enhanced MRA,” J. Magn. Reson. Imaging, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 1411–1418.
Hartung, M. P, Grist, T. M. dan François, C. J. 2011. Magnetic resonance angiography : Current status and future directions,” J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson., vol. 13, no. 1, p. 19.
Lindenholz, A et al. 2022. Intracranial atherosclerosis assessed with 7-T MRI: Evaluation of patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack, Radiology, vol. 295, no. 1, pp. 162–170.
Yueniwati, Y. 2022. Pencitraan pada Stroke. Universitas Brawijaya Press, 2016, 2016. Diakses : 18 Mei 2022.
WHO. 2013. Measure Your Blood Pressure, Reduce Your Risk
Westbrook, C dan Talbot, J. MRI in Practice
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Hadi Eka Hamdani Hadi, Eka Juliantara, Ni Nyoman Supriyani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
