DIFFERENCES IN ANATOMIC IMAGE QUALITY ON SHOULDER JOINT MRI EXAMINATION USING SHOULDER COIL AND FLEX COIL AT HOSPITAL OF HASANUDDIN UNIVERSITY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54973/miror.v3i1.262Keywords:
Shoulder Coil, Flex Coil, Signal to Noise Ratio, SNRAbstract
Background: Shoulder Joint MRI examination is one of the musculoskeletal examinations that is often carried out in the MRI modality because the Shoulder joint is one of the most active joints. In order to be able to visualize a good image, the right coil is needed, in the shoulder joint MRI examination it is recommended to use a shoulder array coil or shoulder coil. This examination can also use a flex coil in an MRI shoulder joint examination at the hospital if the congenital shoulder coil is damaged. The shoulder coil has better image quality because of its shape that surrounds the entire object you want to examine.
Methods: This study used a quantitative approach with a quasi-experimental approach, namely conducting experiments on the observed objects, to find answers to the problems raised by conducting an MRI Shoulder Joint examination using two different types of coils, namely Shoulder coil and flex coil in 10 samples. The data is then processed using SPSS.
Results and Conclusions: Based on the results of statistical test calculations for the SNR value of the anatomy of the shoulder joint, there is a significant difference in image quality, namely the SNR of the anatomy of the shoulder joint using shoulder coil and flex coil which has an overall p value/sig of 0.038 so that Ho is rejected and Ha is accepted. The average SNR for shoulder coil was 312.41 and flex coil was 246.30, so the difference in the SNR value for MRI shoulder joint using shoulder coil compared to flex coil was 66.11. With these results, the more optimal MRI Shoulder joint examination uses the Shoulder coil.
Keywords: Shoulder Coil, Flex Coil, Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR)
Downloads
References
lizai H, Chang G, Regatte R.(2015).MRI of the Musculoskeletal System: Advanced Applications using High and Ultrahigh Field MRI. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol.19(04).
Dutton M.2016.Dutton’s orthopaedic examination, evaluation, and intervention. Fourth edition. New York: McGraw-Hill Education; 2016.
Elmaoğlu M, Çelik A. MRI Handbook.(2012).Boston, MA: Springer US. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-4614-1096-6
Grover VPB, Tognarelli JM, Crossey MME, Cox IJ, Taylor-Robinson SD,
McPhail MJW.(2015)Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Principles and Techniques: Lessons for Clinicians. J Clin Exp Hepatol.
Gottsegen CJ, Merkle AN, Bencardino JT, Gyftopoulos S. (2017). Advanced MRI Techniques of the ShoulderJoint: Current Applications in Clinical Practice. Am J Roentgenol. 209(3)
Hulmansyah, D. (2020). Prosedur Pemeriksaan Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) Kepala pada Kasus Tumor Otak di Instalasi Radiologi RS Awal Bros Pekanbaru. Journal of STIKes Awal Bros Pekanbaru,1(1)
Möller TB, Reif E.(2010). MRI parameters and positioning. 2nd ed. Stuttgart ; New York: ThiemeReda
R, Zanza A, Mazzoni A, Cicconetti A, Testarelli L, Di Nardo D. (2021). An Update of the Possible Applications of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in Dentistry: A Literature Review. J Imaging. 7(5).
Rochmayanti D, Widodo TS, Soesanti I.(2013).Analisis Perubahan Parameter Number of Signals Averaged (NSA) Terhadap Peningkatan SNR dan Waktu Pencitraan pada MRI. 2(4).
Soetikno RD. IMEJING MOLEKULER MENGGUNAKAN MRI: CARA BARU UNTUK DIAGNOSIS TUMOR OTAK GLIOMA.
Westbrook C, Kaut-Roth C, Talbot J.(2011)MRI in practice. 4. ed. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Westbrook C. MRI at a Glance, Third Edition.Westbrook C. Handbook of MRI Technique. :394.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Muhnal Syafitra, Kadek Yuda Astina, Aried Sugiantara
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
